physically describing characters (or not)

[Faibhar]

Well fine, if that works. "Full breasts", however, does seem to raise a red flag of over description. Carry on, though

[Alex Bragi]

Well fine, if that works. "Full breasts", however, does seem to raise a red flag of over description. Carry on, though

I don't think so. 48DDD is a red flag, and in more ways than just the literary sense *gg*, but "full breasts" I think is fine because it leaves it up to the reader to conjurer up exactly how "full" they'd like the breasts to be. I mean, what's huge and titillating to one reader might seem exaggerated and therefor unrealistic to another.

[TomOfSweden]

but "full breasts" I think is fine because it leaves it up to the reader to conjurer up exactly how "full" they'd like the breasts to be. I mean, what's huge and titillating to one reader might seem exaggerated and therefor unrealistic to another.

I've given this some thought. I don't like "full" because it is redundant. If it doesn't convey anything about the breast, it isn't much of an adjective, is it? I think that it at best is just plain confusing.

If it is important I'd rather go with comparatives. If you want a woman to have larger breasts than some other character, then they're "large".