Lest we forget

[mkemse]

TomOfSweden,
i am trying to determine from your post if you supported the invaion of Iraq by the US or not, you also have a typo in your post
because I root the the right in lots of issues, (like invading Iraq for one).
i assume you meant I root to theright or forthe right?? not making fun justnot sure hat you mean
If you mean you supported the United States Invasion of Iraq, it may very well go down in United State Histioy as the biggest Foreign Policy Blumder we as a Nation have ever had,

[TomOfSweden]

TomOfSweden,
i am trying to determine from your post if you supported the invaion of Iraq by the US or not, you also have a typo in your post
because I root the the right in lots of issues, (like invading Iraq for one).
i assume you meant I root to theright or forthe right?? not making fun justnot sure hat you mean
If you mean you supported the United States Invasion of Iraq, it may very well go down in United State Histioy as the biggest Foreign Policy Blumder we as a Nation have ever had,

I supported an invasion of Iraq. There's more positions than just for or against. There's an infinite number of alternative strategies rather than the sceniaro that played itself out.

Who knows what had happened if USA hadn't done what they did. I think the way it happened was better than talking about it for another 10 years. If that's my options then I'm all for USA, (go USA w00t). But in my head, (without a degree in international politics, anthropology, sociology, conflict studies etc ) I can think of a myriad of ways to do the invasion that would lead to a much more stable post-war Iraq.

I'm not sure I understand the difference between rooting "for or to the right". I cast my vote on the conservatives last year. Simply becuase they are in practice the liberals here. I hate politics. Trying to confuse us with non-sensicle labels that made sense in the 19'th century. I'm a liberal and that doesn't really fit on the right-left scale.

[Thorne]

...There's an infinite number of alternative strategies rather than the sceniaro that played itself out...
I can think of a myriad of ways to do the invasion that would lead to a much more stable post-war Iraq...

You have to remember, you're talking about a region which has been almost constant turmoil since the first ape started walking around on two legs. People in the middle east have been killing one another for political, economic and religious reasons, or for no reason at all, without any help from the rest of the world. The only time they seem to stop and band together is when the rest of the world stick their noses in and try to calm things down.

As I see it, speaking as a US citizen, we have several options.
1) We can get together with the rest of the civilized world and isolate the middle east. Build a virtual wall around it and don't let anyone in or out. Just trade them small arms for oil and watch them kill themselves off.
2) Several years ago I recall reading about the US developing a neutron bomb, one which would destroy life without destroying infrastructure. So just sterilize the place and be done with it.
3) Help the Israelis take over the Temple Mount and rebuild their Temple. As I understand it, this will signal the end times and we won't have to worry about much of anything anymore.
4) Use every political means at our disposal and instigate yet another Arab/Israeli war, but this time keep the UN from stopping Israel when they start winning.
5) My favorite: Crank up the space program so we can move the rational part of Earth's population (both of us) to a new solar system. Leave the Earth to the zealots.

[TomOfSweden]

You have to remember, you're talking about a region which has been almost constant turmoil since the first ape started walking around on two legs. People in the middle east have been killing one another for political, economic and religious reasons, or for no reason at all, without any help from the rest of the world. The only time they seem to stop and band together is when the rest of the world stick their noses in and try to calm things down.

As I see it, speaking as a US citizen, we have several options.
1) We can get together with the rest of the civilized world and isolate the middle east. Build a virtual wall around it and don't let anyone in or out. Just trade them small arms for oil and watch them kill themselves off.
2) Several years ago I recall reading about the US developing a neutron bomb, one which would destroy life without destroying infrastructure. So just sterilize the place and be done with it.
3) Help the Israelis take over the Temple Mount and rebuild their Temple. As I understand it, this will signal the end times and we won't have to worry about much of anything anymore.
4) Use every political means at our disposal and instigate yet another Arab/Israeli war, but this time keep the UN from stopping Israel when they start winning.
5) My favorite: Crank up the space program so we can move the rational part of Earth's population (both of us) to a new solar system. Leave the Earth to the zealots.

You're forgetting that 300 years ago Europeans where doing exactly the same thing as the Arabs are doing now to each other, to other religions and to women. You are treating the Arabs, (and Persians) like they will always be like this. In the 13'th century the Arabs where the enlighetened people and the Europeans where the retards. 500 years of currupt Ottoman rule wiped out any head start they had.

...and you're just wrong in that they have always been like this. There's an evolution and we in the West started our journey towards democracy and enlightenment 300 years ago and the middle-east started in the 1950'ies. Just comparing their culture to ours as is just isn't fair. You've got to give them some time to catch up. 50 years is not a lot in these circumstances. It takes many more generations for these values to catch on, and I'm sure they will. They did here and there's no reason it couldn't over there. Don't forget that we take on many values from our parents and the changes in values between generations are very gradual.

...and don't judge them to harshly. We still aren't free from sin and have plenty of problems. Just the fact that women and men don't have equal oportunities or pay, or that we still have rampant racism. USA has increasing numbers turning to religion. How's that for belonging to an enlightened age? Who's up for throwing the first stone? We aren't at some final stage of enlightenment. We are just as the people in the middle-east right in the middle of evolving our culture to something new. Evolution is constant and ever changing.

I'm with you on the space plan. Too many religious freaks down here for my taste.

[Thorne]

You're forgetting that 300 years ago Europeans where doing exactly the same thing as the Arabs are doing now to each other, to other religions and to women. You are treating the Arabs, (and Persians) like they will always be like this. In the 13'th century the Arabs where the enlighetened people and the Europeans where the retards. 500 years of currupt Ottoman rule wiped out any head start they had.

No, I'm not forgetting. True, during the dark ages in Europe the Arab nations were more advanced in sciences and mathematics. The difference is, back then you couldn't kill 2000 people by running a horse drawn coach into a building. Or spread radioctive dust over hundreds of square miles of urban areas with a few pounds of explosives.

...and you're just wrong in that they have always been like this. There's an evolution and we in the West started our journey towards democracy and enlightenment 300 years ago and the middle-east started in the 1950'ies. Just comparing their culture to ours as is just isn't fair. You've got to give them some time to catch up. 50 years is not a lot in these circumstances. It takes many more generations for these values to catch on, and I'm sure they will. They did here and there's no reason it couldn't over there. Don't forget that we take on many values from our parents and the changes in values between generations are very gradual.

First you said that they were more enlightened than the Europeans, now you say we have to give them time to catch up? In other words, they have Devolved.
Personally, I don't care which religion they practice, or who they can con into practicing with them. Everyone is entitled to their own personal beliefs. What I object to is their trying to force their beliefs on the rest of the world through violence and terrorism.(And yes, I know the Roman Catholic Church is just as guilty of this historically.) In my opinion, if your religion is so screwed up that you must force people to accept it, it isn't a religion.

...and don't judge them to harshly. We still aren't free from sin and have plenty of problems. Just the fact that women and men don't have equal oportunities or pay, or that we still have rampant racism. USA has increasing numbers turning to religion. How's that for belonging to an enlightened age? Who's up for throwing the first stone? We aren't at some final stage of enlightenment. We are just as the people in the middle-east right in the middle of evolving our culture to something new. Evolution is constant and ever changing.

It's my understanding that religion in the US is in decline. Except for the very vocal religious right wing fanatics, most people of faith are more interested in their personal form of worship than in organized religion. A quote from the remake of "Flight of the Phoenix" comes to mind. The Arab character says, "Faith brings people together, religion drives them apart."

I'm with you on the space plan. Too many religious freaks down here for my taste.

Anyone ready to book a flight to Alpha Centauri? Shouldn't take more than 10,000 years to get there!

[TomOfSweden]

No, I'm not forgetting. True, during the dark ages in Europe the Arab nations were more advanced in sciences and mathematics. The difference is, back then you couldn't kill 2000 people by running a horse drawn coach into a building. Or spread radioctive dust over hundreds of square miles of urban areas with a few pounds of explosives.

That's fair, but you still have to give evolution time to work. I mean, you have to. There's no other way you or anybody else can do anything about it. We are part of the same planet and there's no way we can avoid each other. The globalisation is speeding up. There's loads of muslims in USA. One in ten Swedes where born in an other country or their parents where. We've got a huge mosque in central Stockholm. Arabs and the Arab culture is everywhere now.

First you said that they were more enlightened than the Europeans, now you say we have to give them time to catch up? In other words, they have Devolved.

Not devolved but froze. They thought they had the worlds most advanced and enlightened culture, (which was true at first). They where Europes and the regions only culture that allowed followers of other religions to stay and live, which for the time was extremly progressive. They had big churches and synagogues that where under the protection of the sultan. What went wrong is that the evolution of the culture stopped and Europe wizzed past them. The same thing that happened to the Roman empire where the "barbarians" ended up having a far superior culture.

If history teaches us anything it's that whenever people become chauvinist about their culture it stops evolving and in time becomes obsolete. Let's try to avoid that ok?

With superior culture I mean the most tollerant culture that allows for the maximum amount of diversity and still holding together. According to the US researcher Richard Florida, cultures like this have historically always been and are always the richest and most technologically advanced cultures in the world.

He floated the concept of gay-index as a way to measure this. Cities that are gay friendly, ie has the highest proportion of openly gay citizens has invariably the highest per capita income. Tollerance makes money. I agree with him 100%. In other words, a cultures superiority can be measured in money. I like things that can be measured.

Personally, I don't care which religion they practice, or who they can con into practicing with them. Everyone is entitled to their own personal beliefs. What I object to is their trying to force their beliefs on the rest of the world through violence and terrorism.(And yes, I know the Roman Catholic Church is just as guilty of this historically.) In my opinion, if your religion is so screwed up that you must force people to accept it, it isn't a religion.

I don't think Islamic terrorism is about trying to convert anybody. It has to do with what muslims consider is the "holy lands" and about attacking any un-believer that dares invade or colonialise it. That's at least what Osama said was his driving force and a good summary of what Islamic terrorisms main philosopher said, Qutb.

[Thorne]

That's fair, but you still have to give evolution time to work. I mean, you have to...Not devolved but froze.

It seems to me that evolution HAS worked over the last thousand or so years: their culture has frozen, as you say, or gone backwards. Our culture has advanced. But cultural evolution and biological evolution work under different rules. And I believe cultural evolution works a lot faster.

If history teaches us anything it's that whenever people become chauvinist about their culture it stops evolving and in time becomes obsolete. Let's try to avoid that ok?

My point exactly. One facet of the extremist Islamic beliefs seems to be that change is bad. Therefore, no progress.
I'm not an historian, so maybe my facts are off a bit, but I think one can safely say that the beginning of the fall of Arab culture began with the rise of Mohammadism. Once again faith degenerated into religion and the common man suffers while the priests/medicine men/Imams/what-have-you flourish.