Welcome to the BDSM Library.
  • Login:
beymenslotgir.com kalebet34.net escort bodrum bodrum escort
Results 1 to 30 of 82

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Just a little OFF
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    2,821
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by DuncanONeil View Post
    Although you "paid" in you didn't really "earn" anything for those payments. Since you were not really buying something, you were being taxed by the Government to fund a benefit program.
    I have always looked at it more as a forced savings account, which is more or less what it was intended to be. The actuality? Far different, sadly.
    "A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything." - Friedrich Nietzsche

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,218
    Post Thanks / Like
    Agreed! Which is why there is always an argument. What it IS vs What was INTENDED. Seems like there is a party that wants credit, and to be the "good guys", based on what they intended to do rather then what they accomplish.

    Quote Originally Posted by Thorne View Post
    I have always looked at it more as a forced savings account, which is more or less what it was intended to be. The actuality? Far different, sadly.

  3. #3
    Usually kinky
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    third rock from Sol
    Posts
    260
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Thorne View Post
    I have always looked at it more as a forced savings account, which is more or less what it was intended to be. The actuality? Far different, sadly.
    Unfortunately, many people have this misunderstanding. It was never intended, nor practiced as a forced savings account. It has always been a pay as you go collection and distribution system with no actual accounts assigned nor assets accumulated in any individual's name. There is no Social Security Trust account; it is simply a collection of Treasury Notes giving the SS system the right to retrieve the excess collections that the congress siphoned away. In its simplest terms it is a government operated Ponzi scheme. Always has been and will be until it is changed.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Back to top