Welcome to the BDSM Library.
  • Login:
beymenslotgir.com kalebet34.net escort bodrum bodrum escort
Results 1 to 30 of 69

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Keeping the Ahh in Kajira
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Last paga tavern on the left.
    Posts
    5,625
    Post Thanks / Like
    Or the Brittish?
    When love beckons to you, follow him,Though his ways are hard and steep. And when his wings enfold you yield to him, Though the sword hidden among his pinions may wound thee
    KAHLIL GIBRAN, The Prophet

  2. #2
    Trust and Loyalty
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    589
    Post Thanks / Like
    denuseri; why the hell would the British want to invade Libya, i think it was 68/69 that we handed our sovriegn bases back to Gadaffi. I know that to be true because i was one of the last British soldiers in Al Adem after the RAF left and the last thing we did was blow to pieces the runway and demolish all traces of the British ever being there. Srategicly it was a waste of time we had to many other bases near the Russians in the cold war to worry about it. There would be no value to the British to go to war with them.

    Regards ian 2411
    Give respect to gain respect

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    NA
    Posts
    869
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by denuseri View Post
    Or the Brittish?
    That's fair comment, den, but I'm sure Britain would have stayed away for much less! Anyway, I have to defer to ian's better knowledge in this regard.

    The fact of the matter is, I think, that Col Gadaffi was scared that the US would (with or without its British lackeys), invade Libya, and, if memory serves me well, this was a fairly widespread belief at the time. For the good of Libya's oil economy, perhaps, and for the sake of Gadaffi's personal well-being, certainly (call me cynical if you like) he was prepared to accept responsibility for the bombing, renounce support for terrorism, and pay $10m wergeld to each family of the Flight 103 victims. It was the price of peace, and the payments were clearly linked to removal of sanctions and blacklisting by the US.

    I think it was felt that it would be better to make Libya pay restitution in return for its rehabilitation, than to whistle in the wind for any form of compensation from the probable real bombers, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, which neither would nor could pay out such money even if it had been proved responsible. But in order to make Libya look guilty, it was necessary for a show trial and a fall guy. Fortunately, Gadaffi was willing to offer up sacrificial victims to the High Court of Justiciary, and Britain was not at all reluctant to prostitute the Scottish legal system in order to secure a conviction.

    So remind me ... what was it that BP did that was so wrong?
    Last edited by MMI; 08-19-2010 at 03:25 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Back to top