rope_monkey: I stand by my original post in regards to what I think. When your vanilla partner finds out, if she is upset and this damages or ends your relationship, was it worth it? No judgement calls, simply which means the most to you?
If you do really feel that the online relationship you are having enhances your vanilla relationship, dig deep as to why that is and explore that. The answers you find will tell you a lot about yourself and the relationship. Are you playing online because it fills a gap that is lacking in your vanilla union? If so, what will you do when the online play ceases? Is it something you're doing online only and not bringing into your r/l relationship because you're embarrassed or afraid to? What can you do to overcome those fears?
There are so many facets to this that remain unanswered, and they're questions well worth digging into.
manda: If you were offended by anything I commented on or asked questions about, I feel bad as that was not my intent. I will always ask questions and comment, as I feel that is the point of this forum, but I certainly am not out and about calling names or trying to damage other people's feelings. For future reference (and please don't take this the wrong way), I simply don't care enough or know enough about other people's lives here to really bother making judgement calls on them. I do, however, enjoy a good discussion.
MacGuffin: Common sense, my friend. I find it is being disregarded in your responses to me. You accuse me of being unreasonable because something I said may or may not have hurt manda's feelings "a little" when the point of my post was to ask how the situation was being handled as so not to hurt other's feelings. Clearly I'm not a fan of feelings being hurt. So, why would I be out to stomp on manda's?
As for what people consider "need to know?" You're right, we could go through the "shades" of that all day but, again, impart a little common sense. In my relationship if I stared at the waiter's ass during lunch, I might not rush home and tell my boyfriend (as I really don't think he cares what the waiter's ass looks like) but if we were to be at the same restaurant together later it certainly wouldn't cause me embarrassment or shame to point out, "hey! We have the waiter with the cute ass. I started at him all through lunch the other day." He'd laugh, as we have discussed what we find sexy and attractive in other people before. On the other hand, I think a line would be crossed for us if I blurted out, "hey, we have the waiter I fucked on his smoke break last week!" The point is, work out your "shades of indiscretion" with your partner. Nitpicking semantics is something that defeats the spirit of the law entirely, disrespects one's partner and reduces the relationship down to who can make the most clever argument. Most of us learned didn't really work in about the fourth grade. "But mom! You said I couldn't walk home with Jimmy after school and play! I didn't "walk" home with him, we ran!" Uh huh.
Same common sense rule applies with lies by omission. If you know enough to know that what you're doing will likely hurt your partner and you don't want to say anything about it as a result, you probably came to that conclusion based on either spoken or implied rules of conduct for your relationship. By being in the relationship to begin with, you are implying consent to those rules of engagement, and breaking them and not saying anything is decietful whether you're asked directly or not. Again, this is something that I would hope we all gave up on trying to be clever in regards to back in the fourth grade. "But Mom, I DIDN'T break the lamp! And I didn't lie! You didn't asked if the baseball I threw in the house broke the lamp!" Uh huh.