Who Wins In 2008

[mkemse]

Like her or not, Hilary is a formidable candidate. She's not backing down; she seems to be very determined. A Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton White House is a real possibility, and you know Bill is going to play a big role, campaining as well as governing.

Personally, I prefer Obama. He's intelligent, charismatic and knows how to compromise( something the present White House occupant doesn't know the meaning of). He reminds me so much of JFK.

Although I like Edwards, I don't see him as President; Attorney General maybe.

Now the Republican: I wouldn't underestimate McCain. Although he supported Bush in the Iraq war, he doesn't seem to be as uncompromising as W. I don't believe he'd veto the Stem Cell Research Bill. Plus, he has a lot of supporters among Independents. That's why he won the NH primary.

As for Romney, he has the big bucks, but that doesn't always translate into votes. What I do think is impressive is that he is a Republican Governor in a predominantly Democratic state( Mass.). Obviously he attracted a lot of crossover votes, which could be an asset in the general election, but it won't mean squat in the primary.

Personally I don't believe an ordained minister, which Huckabee is, should be running for a political office. In my mind mixing politics with religion is a recipe for disaster. There are many examples of that in the world.

Giulianni, although I think he did a superior job as Mayor of New York even before 911, comes across as a surly type, which doesn't bode well dealing with foreign leaders.

Fred Thompson should go back on Law and Order.

Bloomberg could step right in here, especially if the GOP leaders falter.

Interesting, you say that, on the news today they took a poll and found yhat no Repbulican realy has enough support for any walk away nonimation, none of the candiates running in the Republican Party seem to be able to attract any major numbers they said like the Demoxrats seem to, and it was viewed as very possible that the Republican Convention may be the only way to nomiate, that when it come no Republican will have near enough Deligates to elect a nominee, they claim this may not be true With the DEmocratics oending the outcoe of more primary,

As they said, the Democratics like it or not, are far more organized then the Republican Candidates are

[rce]

Interesting, you say that, on the news today they took a poll and found yhat no Repbulican realy has enough support for any walk away nonimation, none of the candiates running in the Republican Party seem to be able to attract any major numbers they said like the Demoxrats seem to, and it was viewed as very possible that the Republican Convention may be the only way to nomiate, that when it come no Republican will have near enough Deligates to elect a nominee, they claim this may not be true With the DEmocratics oending the outcoe of more primary,

As they said, the Democratics like it or not, are far more organized then the Republican Candidates are

Well, the reason may be that there are many more good candidates on the Republican side...

[mkemse]

Well, the reason may be that there are many more good candidates on the Republican side...

Interrsting, I haven't see ANY GODD Candidates on the Reblican Side, all i have see are 2 Religious Fantatics and a Sen. who may not make it to the convention, I would love ot see Ron Paul win it
Fred Thomas has no chance at the nomination