Originally Posted by
delish
I just want to poke my head in and comment on something that's bothering me- I know nobody is intending to be rude, but the word 'doormat' is being thrown around left and right, to the point that it sounds derogatory without having been defined for what it is. I find it to be misleading, because who can truly judge when a sub is not a sub, but is instead a doormat?
There are many types of strengths, and as many personalities as there are people. Some subs don't exhibit their strength through the powerful personality that is being lauded here as The Best Thing Ever (which I know you don't mean that way, again, but for somebody new to stumble in here and read this thread, it could come off that way). Sometimes submission is offered quietly, in a manner that appears to have less fire. The difference is that there are many things that feed our fires- as long as a Dom is lifting up the partner, it doesn't matter that the sub is or is not outspoken/career intensive/naturally controlling in his/her life or what have you. All that matters is that the needs of both partners are being met.
If a Dom is looking for a sub who willingly serves and is naturally submissive, I don't think that makes the Dom a weakling. I think a Dom is a weakling if s/he is threatened by the greatness of his/her submissive, but that has very little (in my opinion) to do with personal tastes within the lifestyle.
I'm not trying to offend or insult; rather I'm trying to offer a bit of perspective. If anyone feels my words are hurtful, please contact me (either here or through PM) so that we can get it straightened out. I am not looking to hurt anyone.