Gorean Philosophies

[denuseri]

The obligation is (i repeat) not on the women to submit.

It is rather the onis of moral responsibility is on the males to reasert thier place of dominance in the hierachy.

And when we dont care, when we excuse the responsibility of each of us to the other we become part of the population that does nothing to contribute or worse drags on the others to support it.

Who stands up and acts with virtue?

Where are morals when no virtues are embraced?

What are we if we ignore our surroundings, if we ignore ourselves.

Wher goes the essence of what it means to be a man or a woman when no one listens with thier heart, and excludes its song for that of theroretical reason alone?

[E.C. Holland]

The obligation is (i repeat) not on the women to submit.

It is rather the onis of moral responsibility is on the males to reasert thier place of dominance in the hierachy.

And when we dont care, when we excuse the responsibility of each of us to the other we become part of the population that does nothing to contribute or worse drags on the others to support it.

Who stands up and acts with virtue?

Where are morals when no virtues are embraced?

What are we if we ignore our surroundings, if we ignore ourselves.

Wher goes the essence of what it means to be a man or a woman when no one listens with thier heart, and excludes its song for that of theroretical reason alone?

If it's the place of men to assert their natural place of dominance, there must be a corresponding duty on the part of women to submit to that dominance, no? I assume any woman who doesn't submit by choice will be forced to submit. And the women who don't really want to be submissive, they are forced (literally) to ignore themselves, no?

What evidence is there that these women who don't want to submit will eventually be happier if they are forced? This is anything but a "theoretical" question.