Art or thinly veiled kiddy porn?

[Alex Bragi]

I wonder if it is being suggested that, because icey's relative used photgraphs of her for inappropriate purposes, my uncle should be on the Sex Offenders Register too.

... and my parents for permitting him to take pictures of my naked sister?

... and me, for keeping the photographs?

No, that not what we're talking about here at all. We're talking about sensual and seductive photographs of a naked prepubescent posing in a very adult manner.

Yet not one of us has used the pictures for sexual stimulation or arousal - simply to record an amusing event.

Is it art? Yes, of a kind, although only a very low level of skill was required to take the pictures. The result is a pictoral story of a child's consternation as her bathwater disappears. But if that is not enough, then I would add that it also serves as a historical document of a well-remembered family event.

Isn't the solution to punish the offender, not everyone else?

Yes, the perpetrator should be punished, but I'm not sure what you mean by "not everyone else"?

So, only a few dozen paedophiles view said photographs? Ok, let's say only a handful? Ok, let's be really unrealisitc and say only one paedophile drools all over them? Well, let me tell you, that's still one fucking paedophile too many for me!

Look, I really can't stress it enough, the photographs I've cited here, are seductive and sexualised photographs of a naked minor. Obviously, I most certainly can't post the photos here or supply a link, but I can assure you all they are very suggestive and sexual, and they are most certainly not happy snaps of a child frolicking in the garden, bath tub or anywhere else.