Thorne you know that if it were a fact that Bush and Chaney were connected in some corrupt way with Haliburton that that situation would be no less common than various other Presidents have had with other outside interest and corporations. You use a talking point of the Democratic Party to detract from the truth of the argument that I present. This type of rhetorical response could go on endlessly and probably will. I give you White Water and the death Mr. Foster as topics and you automatically know where the argument is going. It is a good approach when trying to win a debate but really a good approach in trying to discover philosophical truth. Good try! Nice dance! As naive as they come.

And while it would be nice to believe that Bush and the Congress could do something positive about the economy, experience tells me that that isn't likely to happen,
either. Being at the head of the manufacturing economic system, as you say you are, tells me that you had more directly to do with economy system than the average worker. Having all this first hand knowledge tells me that you know that not any one President or any one Congress has total responsibility for the state of th economy. The North American Trade agreement was a bipartisan effort. But when things go wrong, nobody wants to take credit for it. That's right, blame Bush. It was Bush's fault. Al Queda blames Bush for 9/11 because of his foreign policy. The Democrats blame Bush for national disasters, wars, sickness, and all things that effect the economy. You do a nice dance step but your reasoning is off. We don't expect you to have any faith in the America economy or the American spirit.

This is the kind of macho mentality that is making our streets unsafe That is what you say. Big manufacturing leaders like you just can't disconnect the fact that our country is not in war with Iraq but with Al Queda who did bomb the WTC and who do make our streets unsafe. Al Quesda, with support from ideas like you have, have spread and grown to other parts of the world besides Afghanistan. Leave them alone you say. Well, you say that now. But when they blow your plant to hell, you'll beg Bush to protect you. You ask about honor. Where in hell is your honor?

Your last statement is pathetic. You say the last thing you want is not power. The thing you want is to keep our troops from dying. Then stop giving aid and comfort to the enemy. No matter how you cover it up, you just want to take your country back. Well join yourself with a candidate in another country because none of them in this country is going to admit they will surrender to Al Queada.

When the citizens of this country realize that the Liberals are willing to sacrifice our troops to hurt Bush, they'll throw them out. That's what happened in 2004. That could happen in 2008. Think on these things and you might figure out how the GOP keeps winning.