That is the only point I was trying to make. It is impossible to decide what is 'better' for another. It is impossible to say that 'what I have is better than someone else'. We can only decide for ourselves what is best for us.Hardly the "logical conclusion." But certainly a possible conclusion. I wouldn't say that a person who lacks or has lost one of the primary senses can't have a satisfying relationship. But I would say, without prejudice, it is different than what I experience. Who's to say it isn't in fact, better... save that, as I pointed out to Tojo, language is qualitative. Perhaps, an enhanced sense of touch provides a superior interaction.
A recent survey found that 91.7531% of all statistics determined by surveys were inaccurate.Recent health studies point out the benefits of sex with a partner provides a health benefit that mere solo sexual release doesn't duplicate. It just supports my belief that evolution has made us a social animal, one that requires contact.
__________________






Reply With Quote