I echo a lot of what has already been said. I think even at it's best, it's a sign the person Dominating this way is superficial, or even lazy (eg. "I am a pretty Domme. I don't feel like getting a job. Pay my bills, slave."). At it's worst, it's outright exploitation of male subs by, quite frankly, mental prostituion from people who in some cases probably aren't even real Dommes.

These "Dommes" who flaunt online how they have a stable of like 20 guys paying all their bills... let's just say if they are happy with their boys that's all well and good. I doubt they'd be capable of Dommeing someone like me though.

It generally goes against a lot of what I consider the important priciples of what I view as healthy BDSM or D/s activity, for me personally. And if there wasn't such a shortage of decent Dommes out ther for all those closet sub men, I doubt it would be half as effective as it seems to be currently.

"If however you were to be living with this Domme, and you were not simply a mare from their stable, them controlling your income. Deciding what does or does not get paid for, bought, purchased, without putting you into financial ruin. Then it could be a healthy relationship, but only if it was done to Dominate in a way that can be viewed as caring, and not neglectful."

I agree with ID on this though. If you're in a legitimate 1 on 1 relationship, perhaps it's something one could look more into. For example a lot of D/s kinksters seem to like the concept of "Daddy/daughter" or "Mommy/son" fantasy, and I could see working a sort of "allowance" thing into the picture, if that worked for you. Not for everyone but I'd say that would certainly be much helathier than the sort of "I have a stable of bill payers"... thing.